Discussions

I'm using the example responses to make test cases for our usage of Blowfish:  According to your docs, all HTTP 200 responses have an "aggregated" field. But only some of the sample responses shown have the "aggregated" field, making them inconsistent. In order to parse the responses, we need to be sure they are all the same format. I would bet they are the same format and the example responses are outdated, but the responses are great test objects so even if that is the case, it would be great to have accurate examples :) btw, great product. I'm loving the speed and comprehensiveness of analysis with Blowfish.

Hi there, do you detect if ERC20 tokens are honeypots? e.g. if there are transfer limits, any taxes, whitelists, etc.?

The using experience of the chrome extension is pretty smooth, providing valuable insights to me. But just one quick feedback is that it's a bit annoying that when the user want to give signature or execute transaction etc a new window jump up. Would you consider keeping the "insight,warning signals, simulation results etc" in the extension without any new window pages?

Hey, team. Are you considering to generate a native token for Blowfish?